<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel><title>moonshine - technology &amp; art</title>
<description>find the sublime by the art of the moon.</description>
<language>en-US</language>
<link>http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issues</link> 
<item><title><![CDATA[ Photos of an Abstract ]]></title>
  <category><![CDATA[ technology & art ]]></category><br/>
<link>http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issues/article.php?id=310</link><br/>
<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issue_images/2009/08_rosser1.jpg" align="left" height=30% width=30% hspace=5 vspace-5 >One of the first articles I ever wrote for Moonshine was about photographing your artwork.  This past week a friend asked me to take some photos of a painting he had completed.  He wanted some close ups.  He wanted the photos to show the texture of the work beyond your typical straight on, portrait-of-the-work shot.  I was pleased with these photos.  I thought they really captured the look and feel of the original painting.
The painting is strong – very Pollockesque.  My first thought was to have a shallow depth of field to really put the focus on the chaotic look of the piece.  

Also, the selective bit of focus would highlight the raised paint.  I wanted a plain background – white – to shoot across the painting and get that perspective shot.  We leaned the piece against a chair and used one of the walls in the gallery as the background.  Some of the paint it is a little glossy – so we had to be careful of the gallery lights.  We wanted to have the painting in a spot where there was not spot lighting.  I also chose to not use a flash.  I used a tripod to steady the camera for a slightly longer shutter.  This is the first photo I took. 

After shooting across it with a plain white background – I thought about shooting straight down the canvas toward the dark wood floor.  This was another interesting view to get a similar look of peering across the canvas.  Since the painting has so many different colors – I took this shot at a few different points – looking for the colors and the best combo of what is in sharp focus.  
<img src="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issue_images/2009/08_rosser2.jpg" align="center" hspace=15 vspace=15 height=30% width=30%>
For a better close-up look at the paint technique, I cropped close on one.  I love the way this looks.  
<img src="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issue_images/2009/08_rosser3.jpg" align="right" hspace=15 vspace=15>
Finally, for a nice, formal straight-on view of the total work – here it is.

<img src="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issue_images/2009/08_rosser4.jpg" align="left" width=30% height=30% hspace=15 vspace=15 >I think this series of photos can really give someone the feeling of this painting without the viewer seeing the painting in person.  Of course you want the simple photo to document the work.  But to get the character of some art, you need to get in there, get close and capture the complete look.  To get the first and the last photo I used my 50mm 1.4 and the middle two photos were taken with my 14mm 2.8 lenses.

In contrast to the photos of the painting, I had someone else ask me to take some photos of their office building in an abstract kind of way.  The photos are to be used on note cards and postcards to clients.  She did not care for the name of the business showing in the photo since it would be printed on the stationery.  We walked out into the parking area and I asked her to show me the viewpoint she had in mind.  We both looked up as she detailed to me the look she was after.  At the time we talked it was just about noon and not a good time to try those shots.  I returned to the building early in the evening when the sun was going down.  After taking close to 20 shots, I came home and began the task of editing.  One of the shots really stood out as the view she was describing earlier.  I did not need to crop much of it at all.  What I did with the photo was run it through a series of edits.  One view was a color photo, one was black and white.  I then took the black and white and added a black vignette.  I took the color version and converted it in the watercolor filter.  Then I took the watercolor conversion and applied the bleach bypass filter from a plug in I use frequently.  I love that photo.  I also desaturated the bleach bypass version for the same look – but in black and white.  Here is the black and white and the color versions of the watercolor/bleach bypass side by side along with the original color version.
<img src="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issue_images/2009/08_rosser5.jpg" align="center"  hspace=15 vspace=15 >
I printed the color version on matte paper today.  I really like the look so much, I am thinking of a painting of it.
The abstract painting is by Greg Blair.  Greg owns Dogwood Gallery and Framer in Tyrone, GA.  The office building is Whitlock Ellis Wealth Management in Peachtree City, GA.  Both sets of photos were taken May 29.

<p>
-<em>Donna aka the Barefoot Photographer, teaches photography classes at her studio and is the founder of the Fayette Photo Club. She enjoys the outdoors, photography,  and inspiring others to take better photos; her website is the <a href="http://www.thebarefootphotographer.com">thebarefootphotographer.com</a></em>
</p>
An archive of Donna's articles is located <a href="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issues//search.php?s=Donna%20R.%20Rosser&s_by=author"> here.</a>

<b>> all <a href="http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issues/search.php?s=technology_art&search=Search&index=keyword&sort_by=article_publish&sort_dir=DESC">  <i>Technology & art</i></a></b> articles ]]></description>
<pubDate>2009-06-24 01:57:22</pubDate> </item><item><title><![CDATA[ Facebook Commandments ]]></title>
  <category><![CDATA[ technology & art ]]></category><br/>
<link>http://www.southerncreativity.com/moonshine/issues/article.php?id=337</link><br/>
<description><![CDATA[ A colleague and I were having an interesting chat about facebook. I have my own rules (and practices) for facebook, given that my "friends" are a diverse mix of colleagues, friends + family (some even cross those lines) and drawn from the various areas and interests in my life.

Given that I've articulated these verbally many times, I thought it might be worthy of sharing.... and these are subject to change at any time. ;-) I realize not everyone is going to agree with me and it does involve some level of self-editing (some might also call it censorship). However, I consider it all to be building my digital identity, the digital identity I want, the one I am crafting everyday. Because those of you who know me, know what I say ALOT "If you are not building your digital identity, someone will build it for you!"

With that thought in mind, here are my 14 rules and practices for Facebook use:

   1. You can control who sees your news feeds; however, I decided if I didn't want people to read my feeds, then I shouldn't "friend" them.
   2. I keep part of profile public, so that those I meet at conferences or events can find me. I am careful about what displays as my public information, though.
   3. I don't 'friend' anyone I supervise or any students from one of my workshops/presentations, but if they friend me, I accept the friendship.
   4. I do think about what I write and if I wouldn't say it in public, it doesn't go on Facebook.
   5. I don't friend (or accept friend requests) from strangers unless they have a very good reason (which they explain) for friending me.
   6. I mostly watch my language. If I don't want my mom to read it (and she does), then it doesn't go on Facebook.
   7. Only a few people can see my family photos and some notes. Everyone can see my artwork, blog posts, the majority of my notes.
   8. I do not post any photos or video of my family without permission. I expect them to do the same.
   9. I use Facebook for networking, promotional, and professional development. I push out technology posts and art updates. I follow several colleagues and artists who send me wonderful links and readings through facebook.
  10. I don't spy using facebook.
  11. I accept that my family, friends & colleagues use Facebook and unless they post something really inappropriate (like they were going to bring a gun to work tomorrow or they enjoy stealing from the company), then I wouldn't call them out on it. I may not agree with their politics or personal beliefs or work habits, but I understand that we are all human and have the right to our thoughts. It is really about respect. However, if I discovered that anyone I knew were abusing the internet (regardless of website), then I would question that.
  12. I use it in place of email for almost all non-official email. There, I confess. I did a presentation with a group of freshman just a few months ago, and I discovered that about all they do on the 'net these days is facebook. No youtube, no delicious, no IM, no flickr -- everything is done via facebook and for several in the group, via their cell phones. If I need to archive or I need the email to represent me in an official capacity, then I use an "official" email address.
  13. I don't let it interfere with my work, be it at home or here at the library. The web (regardless of what is it) can be a terrible time suck. The web is part of my work, so I am online an awfully lot (if you didn't notice). LOL
  14. I turn off the services I don't use in Facebook, like IM. Sorry, message or email me instead. IM is too disruptive to me when I working, especially if it involves reading on the web, video editing, or coding (in other words, things which take a lot of brain power!) ]]></description>
<pubDate>2009-08-10 07:59:28</pubDate> </item></channel></rss>